БАГАЦ вынес вердикт, обязывающий евреев покинуть "Дом мира" в Хевроне в течение трех ближайших дней. подробнее...
БАГАЦ постановил: освободить спорный дом в Хевроне в течение трех дней
16 ноября 2008 г., 11:36
Высший суд справедливости вынес сегодня постановление по спорному дому в Хевроне (Байт Мерива или Байт а-Шалом). Пресс-служба министерства юстиции передала, что БАГАЦ принял сторону государства. БАГАЦ приказал поселенцам освободить дом в течение трех дней.
БАГАЦ приказал снести "дом мира" в Хевроне, поселенцы готовятся к сопротивлению
16.11.08 21:52
БАГАЦ распорядился сегодня по истечении трех дней выселить еврейских поселенцев из "спорного дома" в Хевроне. Поселенцы не намерены сдаваться.
БАГАЦ не принял апелляции поселенцев на решение о выселении и дал им три дня на добровольную эвакуацию. Поселенцы просили отложить эту меру до окончательного решения иерусалимским окружным судом вопроса о праве собственности на здание.
В марте 2007 года еврейские поселенцы заняли 4-этажный дом, который находится на расстоянии полукилометра от Кирьят-Арбы, в сторону Пещеры праотцев ("Маарат ха-Махпела") объявив, что законным образом приобрели его.
Правительство с помощью различных юридических уловок пыталось выселить их оттуда. Так, в апреле тогдашний министр обороны Израиля Амир Перец распорядился выселить поселенцев, занявших "спорный дом", несмотря на то, что поселенцы предъявили властям документы о покупке здания. Перец решил воспользоваться параграфом, требующим для заселения дома разрешения министра обороны, и отдал приказ о выселении.
Позднее юридический советник правительства Мени Мазуз блокировал решение министра обороны. По мнению Мазуза, поселенцев нельзя считать вторгнувшимися на чужую территорию, так как не доказано, что они не купили дом, получивший также наименование "дом мира", законно. Выселение нельзя также обосновать немедленной опасностью, так как ЦАХАЛ не готов описать сложившуюся ситуацию, как угрожающую.
Затем поселенцы пытались опротестовать решение министра обороны о своем выселении в суде, но сегодня, после долгих обсуждений, БАГАЦ постановил не в их пользу.
Бывшие палестинские владельцы дома – опасающиеся смерти за продажу дома евреям – уверяют сейчас, что сделка, в конце концов, была отменена. Поселенцы представили в суд кассету, доказывающие, что сделка была совершена по всем правилам.
Решение БАГАЦа вызвало самую резкую критику со стороны правого лагеря. "Они хотят войну? Мы не станем подставлять правую щеку! Амона покажется детскими играми", - заявил житель Хеврона активист Итамар Бен-Гвир.
Пресс-секретарь совета Иудеи и Самарии заявил, что вновь судебные органы встали на сторону враждебного поселенцам правительства, "они вновь не дали фактам помешать их мнению. Хотя поселенцы доказали свое право собственности, БАГАЦ принял политизированное решение".
??????: ?????? ????? "???????" ???? ?????
???: ???? ????? | | NEWS1.co.il/blog/rutag
?????? ???? ????????? ??????? ?????? ???? ????? ???? 3 ????, ?? ?????? ???? ???????: ???? ????? ???? ?????? ?? ?????? ???? ???? ?????? ???? ?????? ????????? ?????? ??????? ?? 15 ??? ???
...
??"? 10302/07
Court: Evacuate Hebron home within 3 days
By DAN IZENBERG AND TOVAH LAZAROFF Nov 16, 2008 12:29 | Updated Nov 17, 2008 2:09
... The unanimous decision to order the settlers to leave the building was handed down by Supreme Court President Dorit Beinisch and Justices Ayala Procaccia and Salim Joubran.
The petition was filed by a settler company, Tal Construction and Investment-Karnei Shomron, and the Association of Renewers of the Jewish Community in Hebron against a police decision to evict the inhabitants under a military order against "fresh trespass."
The order states that if someone seizes property illegally, the person who was legally in possession of the property may evict the trespasser within 30 days. He is permitted to use reasonable force to achieve this.
On March 19, 2007, some 150 settlers took over the empty building located on Worshipers Way, between Kiryat Arba and Hebron's Machpela Cave. They claimed they had purchased it through a Palestinian front man from Faez Rajabi, the man who built it.
Rajabi, however, lodged a complaint with the police, claiming that he had not sold the building. He also petitioned the High Court, calling on it to order the police to help him evict the settlers.
After studying documents provided by the settlers to prove their purchase claim, the police concluded that the documents were forged and Rajabi was still in possession of the building on the night the settlers moved in. Therefore, the police agreed to evict the settlers in accordance with the "fresh trespass" order.
In response, the settlers, represented by attorney Nadav Ha'etzni, petitioned the High Court to cancel the police decision on the grounds that they had indeed paid in full for the building and taken possession of it and that Rajabi was a liar. The court postponed its decision on the matter for a year and a half because a separate legal procedure was taking place in a military appeals court on the status of the building.
However, during a hearing on October 29, the High Court announced it was not prepared to wait any longer for the appeals court decision.
On Wednesday, it ruled that the state's decision to evict the settlers was legal and reasonable. The state had sufficient administrative evidence to act on the grounds that Rajabi was still in possession of the building on March 19.
It added, however, that although there was enough administrative evidence to justify the state's decision, the question of who actually owned the building and who was in possession of it on March 19 ought to be heard in district court, which is authorized to examine evidence and hear testimony. The High Court may only consider written depositions filed by the parties to the dispute and the oral arguments of lawyers in support of the written depositions.
Procaccia, who wrote the decision, said, "Under the circumstances, the [settlers] should have turned to the court to prove their right to the building and refrained from taking the law into their own hands by unilaterally taking over the building without the agreement of the possessor.
"Considerations of public order are behind the rule whereby a dispute over ownership of a property should be heard in court and not resolved by force by the disputants themselves. Whoever changes the status quo without the agreement of the person in possession is regarded as the one who broke the peace. Therefore, the right thing to do is to restore the situation to the status quo ante by removing the trespasser from the building and directing him to the [district] court to make his claims."
Procaccia added that, even though by law the building should be returned to Rajabi until the ownership dispute is heard in district court, he had agreed to leave the building in the hands of the state.
The army will make sure that no one enters the building in the meantime.
High Court orders disputed house in Hebron vacated
Aviad Glickman Latest Update: 11.16.08, 13:46 / Israel News
Judges say families residing on disputed property in West Bank city must move out within 72 hours; name State temporary custodian of building pending ruling on title rights. Yesha Council: Government, court collaborating against settlers
The High Court of Justice denied a petition filed by the Jewish community in the West Bank city of Hebron, against the State's decision to vacate the residents of the disputed house in the city.
The dispute goes back to March of 2007, when 20 Jewish families moved into a Hebron house, claiming to have bought it from its Palestinian owner. The Palestinian denied the sale, and has maintained that the house was illegally seized.
The matter has been heard before the court several times. In a hearing in late October, the petitioners presented the court with an audio tape on which the Palestinian is heard admitting he had sold the house to a realtor.
Nevertheless, Supreme Court President Dorit Beinish and the honorable Ayala Procacciathe and Salim Jubran ordered that the residents must vacate the premises within three days; and further ordered that as per the State's request, the State will be named temporary custodian of the property, pending a ruling on the proprietary rights.
Should the residents fail to leave the house on their own accord, the court warned it would issue a squatters' eviction notice against them.
The court also ordered the petitioners, Tal Construction and Investment of Karnei Shomron and the Society for the Renewal of the Jewish Community in Hebron, to pay NIS 15,000 ($3,800) in court fees.
Until the question of proprietary rights is determined, noted the court, the statute does not permit any one side to take possession of the property without the owner's consent. In order to make sure neither side tries to defy the court order, the judges ordered the house doors be sealed by the army.
'Court decision racist'
The High Court ruling sparked a row in the political establishment. The Yesha Council said in a statement that "once again the State Prosecutor's Office and the High Court have cooperated with a government hostile to settlement and have come up with an outrageous and unjust verdict."
The statement added, "Once again they were not let the facts confuse them. The settlers had proven ownership of the property beyond any doubt, yet the government, State Prosecutor's Office and the High Court have collaborated to remove them from the house...
Israeli court orders settlers out of Hebron house
The Associated PressPublished: November 16, 2008
The three-judge Supreme Court panel did not decide who the legal owner is — that will be decided in a trial currently under way in a lower court. But the judges ruled Sunday that the settlers must turn the house over to the state until a decision is made.
If the settlers do not evacuate the house willingly, the decision reads, they will be evicted.
Israeli court gives settlers 72 hours to evacuate a house in Hebron
17.11.08 - 12:37
The Israeli court ordered its settlers to “legally prove ownership of the house and not apply the law themselves by occupying the house against the will of its owner.” The court ordered the settlers to leave the house in three days; otherwise the police will use force to evacuate it.
via lev
??"?: ????? ?? ??? ?????? ?????? ??? 3 ????
??? ???? ?????, ??? ????? ????? ???? ????? ????? - 18:43 16/11/08
??? ???? ??"? ?? ???? ?????? ???? ?? ????? ???? ?????? ?????? ????. ??? ???: ????? ??????????
??"? ??? ????? (?????) ?? ?????? ????? ???? ?????? ?????? ????? ???????? ????? ?????? ???? ????? ????. ???, ???? ??"? ?? ???? ?????? ???? ?? ????? ???? ?????? ?????? ????, ?????? ?????? ???? ????? ?????? ????????, ???? ?? ???? ?? ?? ?????? ?? ???? ??????? ?????? ?? ??????? ?????? ?? ?????? ????????? ???? ????? ??????.
12:35 16/11 Евреи Хеврона: получив удар, мы не подставим вторую щеку!
В ответ на публикацию БАГАЦем своего решения о выселении евреев из "Дома мира", последовали заявления возмущения и протеста со стороны жителей Хеврона, депутатов Кнессета и Организации защиты прав человека в Иудее и Самарии. подробнее...
4:49 17/11 Евреи Хеврона решили: будем бороться за Дом мира
После заседания штаба защиты Дома мира было принято решение о начале общественной борьбы «против изгнания евреев из Дома мира и за право евреев селиться на всей территории Эрец Исраэль». подробнее...
21:49 17/11 Рав Вольпа: предотвратить скверну, не выполнять приказ
Глава Комитета защиты Эрец-Исраэль рав Шалом-Дов Вольпа опубликовал призыв к солдатам ЦАХАЛа и израильским полицейским: предотвратить осквернение Б-жьего Имени в Хевроне, отказаться выполнить приказ о выселении евреев из "Дома мира". подробнее...